论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨阴道炎五联检法与传统镜检法(湿片镜检)在白带常规检测中的应用比较。方法:采用748例妇科门诊患者的白带标本同时用阴道炎五联检法和传统显微镜镜检法进行检测。结果:五联检测法在乳酸杆菌、白细胞、BV及念珠菌的检出率方面均高于传统的检查方法,其中念珠菌的检出率26.20%明显高于传统检测方法的检出率19.65%,该差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);而在滴虫的检出率方面则低于传统检查方法,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)结论:阴道炎五联检法可以较为准确的反映阴道炎病原菌,并且与传统的检验方法具有互补性,因此,联合检测是白带常规检测较为理想的方法。
Objective: To compare the vaginal inflammation five joint test method and the traditional microscopic examination (wet endoscopy) in the routine test of leucorrhea comparison. Methods: The leucorrhea specimens of 748 gynecological outpatients were tested with vaginal inflammation and traditional microscopy at the same time. Results: The detection rate of Lactobacillus, Leukocyte, BV and Candida was higher than that of the traditional methods. The detection rate of Candida was 26.20%, which was significantly higher than the detection rate of traditional detection method by 19.65% , The difference was statistically significant (P <0.01), but in the detection rate of trichomoniasis is lower than the traditional method of examination, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05) Conclusion: Vaginal joint detection method can be more accurate Reflect the pathogen of vaginitis, and with the traditional test methods are complementary, therefore, joint detection is the leucorrhea routine test is a more ideal method.