论文部分内容阅读
第一类:“拼车”交通事故王某与李某二人通过朋友认识,一聊发现都住在北京市北五环外的一个小区,上班地点也相距比较近,王某正为上班挤地铁烦恼不已,就提议说以后搭李某的车,他每月分摊一半的用车费用,李某觉得很划算,就答应了。2013年1月,李某驾车搭载着王某在上班路上与陈某的车辆发生碰撞,事故中王某头部受轻伤。经交警认定,陈某负事故全部责任。但王某认为李某收了费就应当保证他的人身安全,因此将李某也一并诉至法院,要求赔偿他的各项损失约5000元。法院经审理认为,根据双方的约定,王某与李某形成了“拼车”关系,车主李某在此次事故中并不具有过错,因此依法不需对王某的损失承担赔偿责任。最终法院判定负事故全责的陈某对王某的损失承担100%赔偿责任。
The first category: “carpool ” traffic accident Wang and Lee two people know through a friend, talked about living in a plot outside Beijing North Fifth Ring, work places are also relatively close, Wang is working Pushing the subway trouble, it is proposed to take Lee after the car ride, he half a month to share the car costs, Lee felt very good, they agreed. In January 2013, Lee drove Wang carrying a collision with Chen’s vehicle on his way to work, Wang’s head was slightly injured in the accident. The traffic police found that Chen responsible for all negative accidents. However, Wang believes that Lee charges should ensure his personal safety, so Lee will be sued to the court, asking for compensation for his loss of about 5,000 yuan. Court hearing that, according to the agreement between the two sides, Wang and Lee formed a “carpool” relationship, the owner of Lee in the accident is not fault, so according to the law without compensation for the loss of Wang liability. The final court to determine the full responsibility for the accident Chen Wang bear 100% of the liability for damages.