论文部分内容阅读
马克思与德国古典哲学的关系对于中国学界并非一个新问题,但近年来关于这一问题的研究方式发生了一些值得关注的变化。具体来说,学界逐渐摒弃了以文本互释来追溯和印证德国古典哲学与马克思的渊源关系的方式,转而直接运用“德国古典哲学把握问题来展开哲学思维的路径”对马克思哲学进行重新思考和阐释。这不仅对于马克思哲学研究具有深化和重构的作用,而且也推进了中国学人对于西方经典思想的理解和回应。尤为重要的是,这种哲学思维的触角还触及到现代性、人类社会未来发展的可能性与现实性等诸多重大理论和现实问题。在新的研究方式展开过程中,逐渐表现为两种相互对峙的趋向:其一,通过康德来阅读马克思;其二,通过黑格尔来阅读马克思。日本学者柄谷行人的《跨越性批判——康德与马克思》中文版出版之后,这种对峙更趋鲜明。近期我们有幸邀请到正在清华大学访问的柄谷行人教授和国内一些代表性学者就相关问题展开了一场思想的交融和交锋。
The relationship between Marx and German classical philosophy is not a new issue for the Chinese academic community, but some noteworthy changes have taken place in the research methods on this issue in recent years. Specifically, the academic circles gradually abandoned the method of tracing back and confirming the origin relations between German classical philosophy and Marx by means of mutual interpretation of texts. Instead, they directly used the principle of “German classical philosophy grasped the questions to start the philosophical thinking.” Re-think and explain. This not only deepens and reconstructs the study of Marx’s philosophy, but also advances the understanding and response of Chinese scholars to Western classical thought. It is especially important that the tentacles of this philosophical thinking touch upon many major theoretical and practical issues such as the nature of modernity, the possibility and reality of the future development of human society. In the process of unfolding new research methods, it gradually appears as two kinds of tendencies towards each other: first, to read Marx through Kant; secondly, to read Marx through Hegel. This confrontation became clearer after the Chinese version of the Japanese scholar Akira Pentagon’s “Transcendental Critique - Kant and Marx” was published. In the near future, we have the honor to invite the pedestrian valley professor of pearl valley visiting Tsinghua University and some domestic representative scholars to launch a thought blending and confrontation on related issues.