读《史记》,我有一个感觉,就是我是在和活人谈话。司马迁,好人。好人经常倒霉,我对他很同情,也很佩服,觉得他这一辈子没有白活。《史记》是一部什么样的书?大家都知道,它是一部史书,而且是史部第一,就像希罗多德之于希腊,我们也是把司马迁当“史学之父”。但此书之意义,我理解,却并不在于它是开了纪传体的头。相反,它的意义在哪儿?我看,倒是在于它 Reading “Records of the Historian”, I have a feeling that I am talking to living people. Sima Qian, good people. Good people often unlucky, I am very sympathetic to him, also admire, feel that he did not live in vain. As we all know, it is a history book and the first in the history department. Just as Herodotus was in Greece, we also regard Sima Qian as the “father of historiography” . But the meaning of this book, I understand, but it does not lie in it is the beginning of discipline. On the contrary, where is its meaning? I think, it touches on it