必须把我们这里所作的分析称为哲学上的分析,这首先是从否定的意义上说的,即它不是语言学分析,不是语文学分析,也不是文艺学分析或某种专门分析(研究)。然而如果从肯定的意义上说,那么这则是指:我们的研究是在边缘领域,即在上述各门学科的边缘上、在它们的交界处和交叉处进行的。文本(书面形式的和口头形式的)是上述所有这些学科的第一性现实,也是全部人文-语文学思维(甚至包括神学思维和哲学思维——从其渊源上说)的第一性现实。文本是这些学科和这种思维唯一可以作为出发点的直接现实(思想的现实和体验的现实)。哪里没有文本,那里也就不可能有研究和思维的客体。“隐喻性”文本:如果从广义上理解文本,即把它理解为任何有相关联系的符号的综合体,那么艺术理论(音乐理论、造型艺术的理论和历史)与之打 The analysis we make here must be referred to as a philosophical analysis, which first of all is in the negative sense that it is not a linguistic analysis, a linguistic analysis, nor a literary analysis or a specialized analysis (research) . If, however, in the affirmative, then this means that our study is at the margins, at the boundaries and intersections of the above disciplines. The texts, both written and oral, are the first reality of all these disciplines and the first reality of all humanist-linguistic thinking (including even theological and philosophical thinking - from their origins). Text is the immediate reality (the reality of the thought and the reality of the experience) that these disciplines and the thinking can be the only starting point. Where there is no text, there can be no object of research and thinking. “Metaphorical” Text: The Art Theory (Theory of Music, Theory and Art of Molding Art) Beats the Word, If You Understand It Broadly, Comprehend It as Any Synthesis of Associated Symbols