论文部分内容阅读
散文和经验到底是怎样一种关系?这个问题颇值得研究。在20世纪的文论发展中,当一些论者试图在“文本”与“主体”的审美分析理论基础上,用“文化系统”的方法加以新的综合的时候,曾提出过可以用“回忆”“经验”来解释文学生成的设想。这无疑是一种很大胆的、具有启发性的命题设想。从文学的特性来看,可以说,一切文体都具有很强的“散文性”。且不说惯常意义上的抒情、议论等手段在散文中随处可见,就是作为“语言艺术”的文学“文本”特性,散文似乎比其他体裁体现得更直接,更明显。这就说明散文之于文学整体,具有“母体”性质。进一步说,散文可以说是一切具有“叙述”特性“文本”的母体。上述假想的核心是,既然可以用“回忆”“经验”来解释文学性“文本”的生成之源,那么,以“母体”（散文）作为例子加以分析,应当说是恰当的。在这里,散文就超越了体裁、手段等方面而具有了审美根本性的性质。
What is the relationship between prose and experience in the end? This question is quite worth studying. In the development of literary theory in the 20th century, when some of the scholars tried to make a new synthesis with the method of “cultural system” based on the aesthetic analysis theory of “text” and “subject”, they proposed “memories ”Experience“ to explain the idea of literature generation. This is undoubtedly a very bold and enlightening proposition. From the perspective of the characteristics of literature, it can be said that all genres have a strong ”prose.“ Not to mention lyricism in the usual sense, and other means of argument can be seen everywhere in essays, that is, as a literary ”text“ feature of ”language arts,“ prose seems to be more direct and obvious than other genres. This shows that the prose in the literature as a whole, with the ”mother“ nature. Furthermore, prose can be said to be the mother of all ”texts“ with ”narrative“ characteristics. At the heart of the above hypotheses is that since ”memories“ of ”experience“ can be used to explain the origins of literary ”text,“ it should be said that the analysis of ”mother" (prose) as an example should be appropriate. Here, the prose transcends genres and means and has the aesthetic fundamental nature.