论文部分内容阅读
法律适用的对象是案件事实,而案件事实与通常理解的事实概念存在本质区别,案件事实即是已被诉讼程序证成为案件事实的生活事件,案件事实不是既定的、不是被发现的客观事实,而是由诉讼主体运用证据、证据规则和事理逻辑形成的;很多情况下,事实问题即是法律问题,法规范对案件事实起着型构的作用;审判过程中规范与事实相互作用且自我显形;事理逻辑最具研究价值,因为这一研究能揭示出形成案件事实的过程中最能体现法官个人判断的意识因素。本文采用思辩哲学与司法实践紧密联系,从抽象到具体,从具体上升为抽象的研究方法。
The object of law is the fact of the case, and the fact of the case is different from the commonly understood factual concept. The fact of the case is the life event that has been confirmed as the fact by the litigation procedure. The fact of the case is not an established objective fact, But by the subject of litigation using evidence, evidence rules and the logic of the formation of logic; in many cases, the fact that the problem is the legal issue, the legal norms on the facts of the case plays a role in the structure; norms and facts in the trial process of interaction and self- ; The most logical research logic, because this study can reveal the formation of the facts of the case can best reflect the judge’s personal judgment of the factors of consciousness. This article uses the speculative philosophy and judicial practice closely linked, from abstract to concrete, from specific to abstract research methods.