论文部分内容阅读
20世纪50年代末,孙瀛洲先生认为出现在成化斗彩瓷上的“差紫”是原来烧造时所产生的差异色疵.这种观点早已被中国文物界普遍接受.但近20年来景德镇明御器厂遗址出土了数以吨计的成化瓷片,至今从未发现一片带有“差紫”的瓷片.国内无论是文物界还是科技界,几乎没有学者对出现在成化斗彩上的“差紫”提出疑问,并做深入的研究和考证.英国大英博物馆研究实验室的科技人员,曾利用X荧光衍射分析仪对该馆收藏的一件成化斗彩高足杯上的“差紫”进行过无损成分分析,确认“差紫”是由1923年发生在紫禁城中建福宫的火灾造成的色彩损伤.在英国大英博物馆的研究基础上,笔者根据陶瓷工艺学原理,对成化斗彩“差紫”形成的色化学机理,做了深入细致的研究,对“差紫”形成的原因做出了科学合理的解释,并与近代清宫历史相结合,揭开了成化斗彩“差紫”之谜,纠正了中国文物界普遍存在的对“差紫”形成的错误认识.证明科技考古是古陶瓷研究深入发展的必然趋势.
In the late 1950s, Mr. Sun Yingzhou thought that the “poor purple” appearing on Chenghua Doucai was the original color difference caused by firing, which has been generally accepted by Chinese relics industry, but nearly 20 Over the past few years, Jingdezhen MingYiChang ruins unearthed thousands of tons of Chenghua porcelain, has never been found with a “purple” porcelain .Whether domestic cultural heritage or science and technology, almost no scholars on the emergence of In Chenghua bucket color on the “poor purple” questioned, and do in-depth research and research.British British Museum Research Laboratory of science and technology personnel, who have used X fluorescence diffraction analyzer of the museum collection of a Chenghua The non-destructive component analysis of “Violet ” on the Cup of Fighting Cup confirms that “Violet ” is a color damage caused by a fire that took place in Jianfu Palace in the Forbidden City in 1923. In the British Museum Based on the principle of ceramic technology, the author made deep and meticulous research on the color chemistry mechanism formed by Chenghua Doucai “Difference Purple ” and made a scientific and rational Explained and combined with the history of the Qing Dynasty in the Qing Dynasty, opened the mystery of Chenghua Doucai “Violet ” and corrected Chinese cultural relics widespread misunderstanding of “purple ” proved that scientific and technological archeology is the inevitable trend of the further development of ancient ceramics research.