船舶碰撞事件之所以存在法律争点有待厘清,加上涉外因素的掺杂以及多元的水面栽具是否均需一体规范,仍不无探究之必要。在关于船舶碰撞的相关规制中,以其目的性来看似未排除任何海上载具之必要,因此适用之船舶范围相较于其他规制事项也广泛得多。在探讨执行权力的执行管辖权时,除了既有管辖权之基础外,仍应深入探讨海域执法权限的问题。而为了落实法律秩序的维持,对于特定破坏法秩序之不法行径,首应探究台湾是否对之有管辖权——即诉究其责任之权力,其次则是确认执行拿捕以实现诉追权力的执法界限。 There is still a legal dispute to be clarified about the reason of the collision in ships. With the adulteration of foreign factors and the diversity of water surface planters, it is not necessary to explore the law. In the relevant regulation on ship collision, it appears that its purpose is not to exclude the necessity of any marine vehicle, so the range of applicable ships is much broader than other regulatory matters. In exploring the implementation of the jurisdiction of the executive power, in addition to the existing basis of jurisdiction, should still be discussed in depth maritime law enforcement authority issues. In order to carry out the maintenance of the law and order, we should first of all probe into whether or not Taiwan has jurisdiction over the illegal acts that specifically undermine the order of the law - that is, the power to prosecute its responsibilities and secondly to confirm the enforcement of the arrest to enforce the lawsuit. limit.