论文部分内容阅读
我国《民事诉法》第72条及《行政诉讼法》第35条均明文规定:“人民法院对专门性问题认为需要重新鉴定的,应当交由法定鉴定部门鉴定”。由此确立了《医疗事故处理条例》第20条关于医疗事故争议案件,“应当交由负责医疗事故技术鉴定工作的医学会进行鉴定”的法律地位。然而,每当医学会对医疗争议案件作出“不属医疗事故”的结论时,原告及其代理人和一些媒体往往会发出:由医学专家对医事案件进行鉴定是“老子鉴定儿子”,是“既当运动员又当裁判员”的议论。其实,这样讲是没有道理的。所谓“老子为儿子进行鉴
Article 72 of China’s Civil Procedure Law and Article 35 of the Administrative Procedure Law expressly stipulate: “Where the people’s court deems it necessary to re-appraise a special issue, it shall be appraised by a statutory appraisal department.” This established the “medical malpractice Ordinance” Article 20 on medical malpractice cases, “should be responsible for the technical assessment of medical malpractice identification of the legal status.” However, whenever the medical society concludes that the medical dispute cases are “medical malpractice”, the plaintiff, his agent and some media often send out the case that the medical expert appraising the medical case is “I certify the son” and “ Both as athletes and referees ”argument. In fact, this is not justified. The so-called "Lao Tzu for his son Kam