论文部分内容阅读
曼宁是美国法律解释新文本主义理论的代表性人物。在多角度质疑立法史的基础上,曼宁重新定位了目的/意图主义,并提出了尊重制定法文本通常含义的原因和获取这一含义的方法;与此同时,他还指出,宪法解释应当同制定法解释一样遵循文本主义。曼宁的理论使得文本主义向第二代转变,并统一了宪法和制定法的解释方法,但仍缺乏对实践支撑和目的一文本相融合倾向的足够关注。
Manning is a representative figure in American legal interpretation of neo-textism. On the basis of questioning the legislative history from multiple angles, Manning repositioned the purpose / intentionalism and proposed the reason for respecting the usual meaning of the enactment of the French text and the method for obtaining this meaning. At the same time, he also pointed out that constitutional interpretation should Follow the same statute as interpretations of texts. Manning’s theory transformed the textualism to the second generation and unified constitutional and statutory methods of interpretation. However, there was still a lack of sufficient attention to the tendency of combining practical support with textual one-purpose.