我在教《蚕和蜘蛛》时,一个学生说:“丁老师,这篇课文太不公平了,贬低了蜘蛛。蜘蛛为人民捉害虫,怎么好说它自私呢?”“好,你讲得很好!他联系了自然课,敢于向课文挑战,这种精神值得大家学习!”我充分地肯定。学生提出了这样正确,这样有创见的意见有什么不好?为什么要用课文内容去束缚他们呢?“作者有偏见,要说蜘蛛结网是为了自己的饭食,那么蚕织茧不也是为了它自己的成熟, When I was teaching “Silkworms and Spiders,” one of the students said: “Teacher Ding, this article is too unfair and belittles the spiders. Good! He contacted the natural class, dare to challenge the text, this spirit is worth learning! ”I am fully affirmed. Students put forward such a correct, so innovative ideas have any bad? Why use the text content to bind them? "The author is biased, to say that the spider network for their own meals, then silkworm cocoon not for it Own mature,