论文部分内容阅读
目的分析对比不同的口腔修复膜材料对牙种植引导骨再生的临床应用效果。方法选取400例行牙种植引导骨再生的患者,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析,分为观察组与对照组,各200例。观察组采用海奥口腔修复膜,而对照组采用钛膜,对两种不同的口腔修复膜材料的临床效果进行比较。结果与对照组进行比较,观察组行牙种植引导骨再生患者的骨厚度、植骨厚度、修复成功率明显要更高,而不良反应发生率则显著要更低,组间对比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论海奥口腔修复膜在牙种植引导骨再生手术中有较好的临床效果。
Objective To analyze and compare the clinical effects of different oral repair materials on the guide bone regeneration of dental implants. Methods A total of 400 patients undergoing dental implantation for guiding bone regeneration were selected and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into observation group and control group, with 200 cases each. The observation group used Haiao oral repair membrane, while the control group with titanium membrane, the clinical effect of two different materials for oral repair membrane were compared. Results Compared with the control group, the bone thickness, the thickness of the bone graft, the success rate of repair in the guide group and the bone regeneration group in the observation group were significantly higher, but the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower, the difference between the groups was statistically Significance (P <0.05). Conclusions HAO Oral Repair Membrane has good clinical effect in dental implant guided bone regeneration surgery.