论文部分内容阅读
2014年3月某日,原告张某由于忘记开庭时间,同时又因手机故障未能接听承办法官的数个问询电话,其案件被笔者所在法院按撤诉处理。次日,张某来到法院,当被告知其案件已被按撤诉处理,并应承担一半的诉讼费时,张某情绪极其激动,认为他并非故意不到庭,法院如此做法乃霸王行为,强烈要求见院长“讨说法”。在张某的一再吵闹下,法院最终通过司法救助程序,免除了张某的诉讼费,并告知其可再次起诉,张某方才罢休。
On March 29, 2014, the plaintiff, Zhang, was dismissed by the court where the author was located as a result of forgetting the court opening hours and failing to answer the inquiring telephone number of the judge due to a cell phone breakdown. The next day, Zhang came to court. When he was told that his case had been dismissed and should bear half of the litigation costs, Zhang was extremely emotionally excited. He did not mean that he was not deliberately in court. See Dean Seeking “to discuss”. In Zhang repeated noise, the court eventually passed the judicial rescue process, eliminating Zhang’s legal fees, and told them to sue again, Zhang side before giving up.