历史比较研究一直受到史学界人士的广泛赞扬。历史比较研究方法的起源,可以经由威廉·罗伯逊(William Robertson)、亚当·斯密追溯到孟德斯鸠、维科(Vico)、和马基雅维里(Machiavelli),再溯源而上,直到波里比阿(Polybius)和希罗多德(Herodotus)。孔德认为比较研究是观察的最高形式,他认为,当通过“历史方法”着手采用比较研究时,它是“政治逻辑系统可以依赖的唯一基础”,并且是“在逻辑和科学意义上赋予社会学以哲学特征力的方法。而马克思主义则是历史比较研究的强大促进因素。 Historical comparative research has been widely praised by historians. The origins of historical comparative research methods can be traced back to Montesquieu, Vico, and Machiavelli via William Robertson and Adam Smith, Polybius and Herodotus. Comte considers comparative study as the highest form of observation. He believes that it is “the only basis upon which the system of political logic can be relied upon” when the comparative study is to be started by “historical methods,” and that "it gives the community, in a logical and scientific sense, Learn the power of the philosophical method, while Marxism is a powerful contributing factor to the comparative study of history.