论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨聚焦超声术与微波治疗宫颈糜烂疗效对比。方法 2010年1月至2011年1月收治的宫颈糜烂患者200例分为聚焦超声组100例,微波治疗组100例,观察两组临床疗效及副反应发生情况。结果两组总有效率比较P>0.05差异无统计学意义。两组阴道排液发生率、阴道流血发生率比较P<0.05差异有统计学意义。结论聚焦超声治疗技术在宫颈糜烂治疗中具有良好的临床疗效,操作简单、创伤小、副反应轻微,是治疗宫颈糜烂首选的治疗方法。
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of focused ultrasound and microwave on cervical erosion. Methods From January 2010 to January 2011, 200 cases of cervical erosion patients were divided into focused ultrasound group 100 cases, microwave treatment group 100 cases, the clinical efficacy and side effects were observed. Results The total effective rate between the two groups was no significant difference P> 0.05. The incidence of vaginal discharge in two groups, the incidence of vaginal bleeding compared P <0.05 difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Focused ultrasound treatment has a good clinical curative effect in the treatment of cervical erosion, simple operation, small trauma and minor side effects, which is the preferred treatment for cervical erosion.