2001年7月24日,最高人民法院发布公告,公布了《最高人民法院关于以侵犯姓名权的手段侵犯宪法保护的公民受教育的基本权利是否应承担民事责任的批复》。对这一司法解释,也许并未引起社会公众多少注意,但在法律界、法学界尤其是宪法学界的影响却非同凡响。最高法院的批复堪称我国宪法诉讼的里程碑,开创了我国法院通过司法审查保障宪法意义上的公民基本权利的先河;开创 On July 24, 2001, the Supreme People’s Court issued a public notice announcing the “Reply of the Supreme People’s Court on Whether civilians should be civilized for violating the constitutional protection of the basic rights of citizens under the power of violating the name right.” The judicial interpretation of this may not have caused much attention to the public, but in the legal profession, the legal profession, especially the influence of the constitutional scholarship is extraordinary. The approval of the Supreme Court is a milestone in our country’s constitutional lawsuit and a precedent for our courts to protect the basic rights of citizens in the constitutional sense through judicial review.