【裁判要旨】奥运会开幕式与开幕式表演的录像具有不同的法律性质,审理此类案件应首先让当事人明确其诉讼对象。就奥运会开幕式而言,不能因为其不属于著作权法规定的八种具体作品类型就否认其作品属性,应结合独创性要求认定其为特殊类型的汇编作品。在当事人无法提供国际奥委会与主办城市签署的奥 The purpose of the referee The opening ceremony of the Olympic Games and the opening ceremony of the video has a different legal nature, the trial of such cases should first let the parties clear the object of their proceedings. As far as the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games is concerned, it can not be denied the attributes of its works because it does not belong to the eight specific types of works stipulated in the Copyright Law. It should be considered as a special type of compilation works in accordance with the original requirements. The parties can not provide the IOC signed with the host city