论文部分内容阅读
“人格”与人身混淆,人格权法代替《民法通则》“人身权利”法,致立法空泛,平民利益难保,总分则逻辑混乱。“死者的权利”致主体错误,赔偿金分配不公。“动物权利法”把熊当成了人,人的痛苦被漠视。“居住权”被曲解为仅给妻子或保姆,致《物权法》定稿时删除,使一些单位奖励房、赠与子女房屋、夫妻对对方所有的房屋失去居住物权保障。“无主物”的解释严重偏离现实。“应当”履行的法定义务被曲解为“道德义务”。以期望的“夫妻婚后所得共有制”曲解事实上的法定模糊双轨制。“同命同价”曲解为不再对劳动能力的伤害赔偿和轻蔑“同残同赔”。这些违背常识的错误已致立法科学和司法公正被践踏。
“Personality ” confused with the body, personality rights law instead of “General Principles of Civil Law ” “personal rights ” law, resulting in legislation is empty, the interests of civilians, the total score is chaotic logic. “The rights of the deceased ” caused the main error, the unfair distribution of compensation. “Animal Rights Act ” Bear as a human, human suffering is ignored. “Residency ” is misinterpreted as only to the wife or nanny, resulting in the deletion of the “Real Right Law” finalized, so that some units reward room, gift and child housing, the couple lost to each other all the housing security of tenure rights. The interpretation of “无 主 物” deviates from reality seriously. The legal obligations “should” be misinterpreted as “moral obligation”. With the expectation of “the common ownership of the married couple” misinterpreted the de facto legal fuzzy dual system. “Same life with the same price ” misinterpreted as compensation for labor power and contempt “with the same residual compensation ”. These common-sense errors have led to legislative science and justice being trampled on.