黄某开一家超市,雇华某为帮工,并约定由黄某提供食宿。一日,华某于晚上睡觉时,被撬门入店的、与华某有仇的李某杀害。不久,李某被处以死刑。因李某的财产数额,不够赔偿华某的丧葬费等,华某之父遂要求黄某赔偿不足部分。按理,黄某虽与华某虽形成雇佣关系,但华某被害系他人的报复行为所致,并非由于执行职务行为而引起,雇主不 Hwang opened a supermarket, hired a to help workers, and agreed to provide accommodation by Hwang. One day, Hua Miao sleep at night, was crowded into the store, and the murder of a murdered Lee. Soon, Lee was sentenced to death. Due to the amount of property, Lee, not enough compensation for funeral fees, etc., Huamu then asked Hwang compensation for the lack of part. Logically, though Hwang although the formation of an employment relationship, but Huasheng was caused by the retaliation of others, not due to the performance of the duties caused by the employer is not