论文部分内容阅读
This paper discusses the methodology of Chinese classical hermeneutics, taking one of the main Han-Song controversies, i.e. the different interpretations on Analects 12:1 between the Han school and the Song school. After comparing in detail the interpretations on keji (self-discipline) of both sides, the author holds that the interpretation of Han school is actually under-interpretation, though the Han school regards the interpretation of Song school as over-interpretation. This paper questions the traditional view, which believes the Han school is superior to the Song school on the classical interpretations.
This paper discusses the methodology of Chinese classical hermeneutics, taking one of the main Han-Song controversies, ie the different interpretations on Analects 12: 1 between the Han school and the Song school. After comparing in detail the interpretations on keji (self-discipline the author holds that the interpretation of Han school is actually under-interpretation, though the Han school regards the interpretation of Song school as over-interpretation. This paper questions the traditional view, which believes the Han school is superior to the Song school on the classical interpretations