近年来,翻译界在若干问题上产生了激烈的论争:如何界定翻译的内部研究与外部研究,翻译研究的边界在哪里,以及如何评价葛浩文的翻译等等。论争的实质是对“翻译”和“忠实”界定的分歧;这些分歧大多产生于对翻译描述与界定的多样性——研究范式的不可通约。从翻译研究的模仿论、社会行动论到文化论的转换必然导致理论视角、研究方法和评价标准的变化。翻译 In recent years, the translation community has fierce arguments on several issues: how to define the internal and external research on translation, where are the boundaries of translation studies, and how to evaluate Ge Haowen’s translation. The essence of the debate is the definition of “translation” and “faithfulness”; most of these differences result from the incommensurability of research paradigms in the description and definition of translation. From the translation theory of imitation, the theory of social action to the transformation of culture will inevitably lead to changes in theoretical perspectives, research methods and evaluation criteria. translation