论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨医学生考试焦虑和应对方式的关系,为考试焦虑的干预提供理论依据。方法采用考试焦虑量表和应付方式问卷对某医学院校424名医学生进行问卷调查,分析应对方式与考试焦虑的关系。结果高水平考试焦虑的学生占4.96%;考试焦虑存在年级、专业差异,但不存在性别差异;应对方式存在性别、年级、专业差异;考试焦虑与应对方式的解决问题因子呈负相关水平;考试焦虑与应对方式的自责、幻想、退避和合理化因子呈显著正相关;自责对考试焦虑的回归效应显著。大学生考试焦虑与应对方式密切相关,有考试焦虑者多采用消极应对方式,而无考试焦虑者多采用积极应对方式。结论在干预应对方式时,应反复地培养学生的自信心,减少自责,从而降低学生考试焦虑水平。
Objective To explore the relationship between medical exam anxiety and coping style, and to provide a theoretical basis for the intervention of test anxiety. Methods A questionnaire of test anxiety scale and coping style was used to conduct a questionnaire survey on 424 medical students in a medical college to analyze the relationship between coping style and test anxiety. Results There were 4.96% students with high level test anxiety. There were grade and professional differences in test anxiety but no gender differences. There were gender, grade and specialty differences in coping styles. Test anxiety and coping styles were negatively correlated with problem solving. There was a significant positive correlation between anxiety and self-blame, fantasy, back-off and rationalization of coping styles. The regression effect of self-blame on test anxiety was significant. Test anxiety and coping styles are closely related to college students, and test anxiety often adopts negative coping style instead of test anxiety. Conclusion In coping with coping style, students should be repeatedly self-confidence, reduce self-blame, thus reducing the level of student anxiety test.