论文部分内容阅读
目的:检验多维状态无聊量表(MSBS)在中国和加拿大大学生样本中的因素等值性,并比较量表各因子在两样本间的潜均数差异。方法:使用多维状态无聊量表调查360名中国大学生和360名加拿大大学生,并对调查数据进行多组验证性因素分析。结果:量表的完全等值性不成立,依据模型修正指数和释放参数等值限制时模型拟合的改变量,发现24个设定等值的因素负荷中的6个,29个截距中的10个,29个测量残差中的6个不等值;中国大学生样本在MSBS五因子上的潜均数均显著低于加拿大大学生样本。结论:多维状态无聊量表在中国大学生样本和加拿大大学生样本间具有部分测量等值性和完全结构等值性;MSBS显均数差异不能完全由潜均数差异解释。
Aims: To test the equivalence of factors in multidimensional statelessness scale (MSBS) in college students in China and Canada, and to compare the potential mean differences of each factor in two samples. Methods: 360 multidimensional state boring scales were used to investigate 360 Chinese college students and 360 Canadian college students, and to conduct multiple sets of confirmatory factor analysis on the survey data. Results: The complete equivalent of the scale was not established. According to the change of the model fitting when the model modification index and the release parameter were equal-value constraints, it was found that among the 24 set of equivalent load factors, 6 out of 29 intercepts 10, and 29 unequal values among the 29 measurement residuals. The mean number of Chinese college students in MSBS five-factor was significantly lower than that of Canadian college students. CONCLUSION: The multidimensional state-borne scale has some measures of equivalence and complete structure equivalence between Chinese college students and Canadian college students. The differences of MSBS significant mean can not be completely explained by the difference of potential mean.