论文部分内容阅读
这些年,颇有几种儿童读物在市场热卖后,却在文坛遇冷,有的还遭到了严厉的批评。这就引起了争论,并出现了一些大相径庭的结论。大致看来,可分两派,一派站在市场的立场说话,一派则貌似站在“文坛”一边。而我以为,对此需作具体分析,不可一概而论。是市场盲目狂欢而文坛独具火眼金睛吗?是评论家瞎了眼而小读者最具判断力吗?应该遵循“民主”原则让购买者说了算吗?评论家应按照市场动向修改自己的评判标准吗?市场应在文坛高人指导下走向良
In recent years, quite a few kinds of children’s books have been severely criticized in the literary arena after their hot sale in the market. Some have also been severely criticized. This has caused controversy and some very different conclusions have emerged. Generally speaking, it can be divided into two groups and one group stands in the position of the market. One group looks like it is standing on the side of “literary world.” And I think this needs to be analyzed in detail, and it can not be generalized. Is the market a blind carnival and the literary arena unique eye-catching? Is the judge blind and small readers the most judgments it? Should follow the “democracy” principle let the buyer have the final say? Critics should modify their own market trends Criteria? The market should be under the guidance of the literary world to the direction of good