发表过和办案人员意见相左的看法的记者,大多都听到过“舆论干涉办案”的指责:“我们法院(或检察院)依照法律规定独立行使审判权(或检察权),不受干涉。”新闻舆论不能“干涉办案”吗? 不可否认,对案件的报道、特别是带有批评性质的报道,往往形成舆论“干涉办案”的情况.“舆论”能否“干涉办案”?司法机关“独立办案,不受干涉”,此原则由多个法律加以规定。“司法独立”是一个重要的法律原则,它的正确性无可挑剔,但“司法独立”这一原则的前题是司法机关严格遵照程序法和实体法 Most journalists who have published opinions that differ from those of the investigators have all heard the accusation of “interference by the media in handling cases”: “Our courts (or procuratorates) independently exercise jurisdiction (or procuratorial power) in accordance with the law and are not subject to interference.” Public opinion can not “interfere in the handling of cases”? Undeniably, the coverage of cases, especially reports with criticism, often form the situation of “interference in handling cases” by public opinion. Handling cases without interference “. This principle is governed by a number of laws. The ”judicial independence“ is an important principle of law. Its correctness is impeccable. However, the prerequisite of the principle of ”judicial independence" is that the judiciary strictly follows procedural and substantive laws