论文部分内容阅读
信息网络环境使得异化的犯罪行为与刑法理论及司法实务之间的关系日趋紧张已是必然,特别是针对信息网络犯罪行为人自首的认定所带来的司法困境便是适例。在刑事立法(可能)功利性地扩张了信息网络犯罪处罚范围这一已然的现实背景下,肯定严惩危害信息网络安全违法犯罪行为价值本身的同时,对犯罪行为人具有法定情节的必要宽宥则是宽严相济这一基本刑事政策的当然体现。作为宽严相济刑事政策在刑法中具体体现之一的自首制度,当行为人犯罪后的行为符合自首制度的设置初衷及自首的本质要求时,刑事司法中就应当在遵循罪刑法定的前提下通过具体的刑法解释将其合理地认定为自首,让刑事立法与刑事政策在双向互动的态势中此消彼长地寻求最优化的平衡,以实现防止犯罪和保障人权,并增加刑法的公众认同感,更好地实现信息网络犯罪刑法扩张的目的。
It is inevitable that the information network environment has made the relationship between alienated criminal behavior and criminal law theory and judicial practice increasingly tense. Especially for the judicial predicament caused by the cognizance of information cybercriminal activists, it is appropriate. While criminal legislation (possibly) utilitarianly expanded the scope of punishment for information cybercrimes, while strictly punishing the value of crimes that endanger the safety of information cybercrimes, it is necessary to forgive the criminal offender’s legal circumstances The basic embodiment of this basic criminal policy of tempering justice with temper justice. As a system of surrender of criminal justice in which the criminal policy of temper justice with mercy embodies one of the concrete manifestations of the criminal law, when the perpetrator commits a crime in line with the original intention of surrendering the system and the essential requirement of surrendering himself, criminal justice should pass the specific The Criminal Law Interpretation will be reasonably recognized as surrender, so that criminal legislation and criminal policy in the two-way interaction between the two sides to seek the most optimal balance in order to achieve the crime prevention and protection of human rights and increase the public recognition of criminal law, To better achieve the purpose of criminal expansion of information cybercrime.