论文部分内容阅读
仲裁的性质作为仲裁这种纠纷解决机制的一种内在规定性和特质,本该是相对恒定、同一的。但是,目前理论界对此存有不同意见。立足现实,依循历史发展轨迹,探本溯源,明确仲裁的性质,对于完善仲裁制度,促进仲裁制度的健康发展,使之更好地为社会主义市场经济建设服务具有重要意义。通过对理论界关于仲裁性质四种主要学说的回顾与思考,阐述并分析了仲裁的历史沿革过程,划分了仲裁发展的四个阶段,提出仲裁是一种自治性与准司法性融合生成的制度,仲裁因而具有混合性质的观点。这时的“准司法性”具有特定含义。
The nature of arbitration as an inherent arbitrariness dispute resolution mechanism and nature of the inherent, it should be relatively constant, the same. However, there are different views on the current theory. Based on the reality, following the path of historical development, probing the source of origin and clarifying the nature of arbitration, it is of great significance to improve the arbitration system and promote the sound development of the arbitration system so that it can better serve the socialist market economy. Through reviewing and thinking on the four main theories about the nature of arbitration in theorists, this paper elaborates and analyzes the historical evolution of arbitration, divides the four stages of arbitration development, and proposes that arbitration is a system formed by a combination of autonomy and quasi- Arbitration thus has a mixed nature. At this time “quasi-judicial nature” has a specific meaning.