论文部分内容阅读
中国的地方人大制度近年来引起了国内外学术界的不断关注。国外研究的最大特点是较为注重实证分析和模式构建 ,具有较强的学术价值。但是由于价值准则的误用和分析层面的局限 ,这种研究难免存在着一些不足之处。与此相对 ,国内的研究则带有很强的规范研究和对策研究的成份。总体上可以将国内的研究概括为制度描述、制度完善、工作改进和行为统计这几种途径。国内研究的最大优势是一手材料的利用和价值准则的趋同 ,但是由于实证程度和模式构建力度的不足 ,同样也存在着需要完善的地方。要真正提升地方人大的研究层次 ,就有必要从中国地方人大的产生和运作过程中去寻找制度层面的内在动力。
In recent years, the local people’s congress system in China has aroused the continuous attention of academics at home and abroad. The most prominent feature of foreign studies is the more emphasis on empirical analysis and model construction, with strong academic value. However, due to the misuse of the value criterion and the limitation of the analysis, there are some shortcomings in this kind of research. In contrast, domestic research has a strong normative research and countermeasure research component. As a whole, domestic research can be summarized as institutional description, institutional improvement, work improvement and behavior statistics. The biggest advantage of domestic research is the use of primary materials and the convergence of values. However, due to the lack of positivism and mode construction, there is also room for improvement. To really elevate the research level of local people’s congresses, it is necessary to look for the internal motivation at the institutional level from the process of its formation and operation.