论文部分内容阅读
西欧中古早期的王国不是罗马国家的延续,也非民族国家、主权国家的某种不完整的、模糊的投射,中古早期的国家应当依其自身进行解释,这是当代论者的基本共识。论者对西欧中古早期王国与罗马制度的关系、早期王国能否纳入“state”这一概念意义上的国家范畴、公共权力与私人权力的关系、王权与地方权力的关系等问题,展开了广泛的讨论。讨论显示,关于国家发展问题的直线的、目的论式的传统解说,在当代学者中不再具有普遍认同。讨论还显示,只有避免将中古早期的政治实践狭窄地范畴化,即避免在“公权”与“私权”、“公法”与“私法”这些二元对立的范畴内观察中古早期的政治生活,才能真正认识那个时代的国家性质和特点。
The early kingdoms of the Middle Ages in Western Europe were not a continuation of the Roman state, nor were some of the incomplete and vague projections of a nation-state or a sovereign state. The early Middle Ages should interpret itself according to itself. This is the basic consensus of the contemporaryists. On the relationship between early Western Kingdom and Roman system in early Middle Ages in Europe, whether the early kingdoms can be included in the conceptual category of “state ”, the relationship between public power and private power, the relationship between royal power and local power, etc. Extensive discussion. Discussions have shown that the straight-line, teleology-based traditional narratives on national development issues no longer have universal acceptance among contemporary scholars. The discussion also shows that only by avoiding the narrow categorization of the early political practices in the Middle Ages, that is, avoiding the binary oppositions such as “public right” and “private right”, “public law” and “private law” To observe the early political life in the Middle Ages can we truly understand the nature and characteristics of the country in that era.