论文部分内容阅读
法律关系渗透于社会日常琐事,本文旨在说明在现代错综复杂的社会关系中不能单纯地从涉案金额、请求权基础来判断是否具有诉的利益。借助裁判文书网中的一则实例,因教科书中的错字而起诉书店与出版社的主张是否应该得到支持。通过案例分析,论证如在证据完备的情况下该请求应当得到支持;并得到诉的利益应兼顾社会的整体评价因素。
The legal relationship infiltrates the daily routine of the society. The purpose of this article is to show that in the complicated social relations in modern times, the interests of litigation can not be judged solely on the basis of the amount involved and the right of claim. With an example in the referee’s book, the claims of the prosecutor’s shop and the publishing house for the typo in the textbook should be supported. Through case analysis, it is argued that if the evidence is complete, the request should be supported; and the interests of the prosecution should take into account the overall social evaluation factors.