欣悉《中国图书评论》决心改进文风,今后要多刊发用散文,随笔小品等文体写的评论文章,要求作者只评一部书的个性,有什么新颖之处,有何创见,同时要写得让非专业读者也爱读。这些意见,可谓先获我心。窃以为,《评论》这种选稿方向,既体现了“书评”的美学要求和社会功能,又吻合了当今被商品经济浪潮弄得精神疲惫不堪的读者群体的心理欲求。过去,雄踞于书评刊物上的那些四平八稳、毫无文采、感情苍白的教条式 We are pleased to learn that China Book Review is determined to improve its style of writing. In the future, we must publish a large number of commentary articles written in essays, essays and other styles to insist that the author only comment on the individuality of a book. What are the novelties and creative ideas? Write for non-professional readers also love to read. These views can be described as the first to win my heart. The theft thought that the direction of the selection of comments is not only embody the aesthetic requirements and social functions of Book Review but also coincide with the psychological desires of readers who are mentally exhausted by the tide of commodity economy. In the past, those who dominated the books and journals on those calm, no literary grace, pale feelings of dogma