论文部分内容阅读
嵇康别集屡经转手,历代目录家或经眼不同版本,或转抄他家著录,对其称名、卷数说法不一,而至明清以后,刻本、抄本纷纷出现,或为辑集所成,或确有宋本所依,但诸家版本对嵇康诗文目录及编次又颇有不同。为厘清这些混乱,鲁迅先生撰写专文《<嵇康集>考》对“卷数及名称”、“目录及阙失”、“逸文”等进行了专题考证,又在《嵇康集》校本中重点介绍了吴宽丛书堂抄本目录情况,正本清源,很好还原了《嵇康集》诗文的本来名称~①。戴明扬几乎与鲁迅同期校勘《嵇康集》,其《嵇康集校注》后出,在《鲁迅全集》1938年版《嵇康集》的基础上踵事增华,更详细梳理了嵇康诗文称题及编次的相关情况。
嵇 Kang set do repeatedly set off, the ancient catalog home or different versions of the eye, or transcribing his family bibliography, its name, the number of different volumes, but after the Ming and Qing Dynasties, engraved, transcripts have appeared, or for the album Into, or do have the Song according to, but all versions of Ji Kang poetry catalog and editing is quite different. In order to clarify these confusion, Mr. Lu Xun wrote a special textual research on the volume and name of “”, “Contents and Que Miss ”, “Essay 嵇 Kang set ”school-based focus on the book catalog Wu Kuan books, the original Qingyuan, a good restore“ Ji Kang set ”the original name of the poem ~ ①. Deming Yang almost collaborates with Lu Xun in the same period, and after his “Ji Kang set school notes”, he went on to reinforce herself on the basis of the 1938 edition of “Lukang Ji” published in the Complete Works of Lu Xun. And the relevant situation of the series.