向来教学就有“教无定法,贵在得法”之说,大学艺术系的课程安排又具有多样性、实践性强等的特点,因此,要以统一的标准去衡量大学里艺术专业的每门课程,确实是有失偏颇,不符合实际情况;但是,作为学习交流,探讨授课方式的多样性,并总结各种授课方式的最终授课效果,对于青年教师提高自身的教学水平,拓展教学思路,有效地提高课堂的教学效率和学生的专业技能水平,都是十分有益的。 In the past, there has always been a theory of “infinite teaching, you are in a position to attain the law,” and the course arrangement of the university’s art department is characterized by diversity and practicality. Therefore, it is necessary to use a unified standard to measure the professional arts in universities. Each course is indeed biased and inconsistent with the actual situation; however, as a learning exchange, the diversity of teaching methods is discussed, and the final teaching effects of various teaching methods are summed up. For young teachers to improve their teaching level, and expand teaching Thinking, effectively improving classroom teaching efficiency and students’ professional skills are all very helpful.