论文部分内容阅读
在缺陷产品的使用后而导致的人身权与财产权的损害,会产生侵权责任与违约责任的竞合。根据我国《合同法》第122条规定,面对此种情况被侵权人享有选择权。然而,一旦选择了侵权之诉的被侵权人在诉讼中就会丧失对于缺陷产品自身的赔偿,无法在同一个诉求中得以支持。对于产品责任赔偿范围是否应当包含产品本身,通说的观点是依据《合同法》第111条和第155条的规定,要求缺陷产品的销售者承担违约责任。因此,倘若人身权与财产权的侵害诉求同时存在,被侵权人就需要通过两个诉讼来获得赔偿。因此,本文认为未来在对《侵权法》修订之时应当时明确规定财产损害的范围包括缺陷产品自身的损害。
The damage of the personal rights and property rights caused by the use of the defective products will result in the co-operation of the tort liability and the liability for breach of contract. According to Article 122 of the Contract Law of China, the infringer has the right of option in the face of such situation. However, once the infringer who has chosen the infringement claim loses the compensation for the defective product itself in the proceedings, it can not be supported in the same appeal. As to whether the scope of product liability compensation should include the product itself, the general point of view is to require the seller of the defective product to bear the liability for breach of contract according to Article 111 and Article 155 of the Contract Law. Therefore, if the claims of personal rights and property rights coexist, the infringer will need to obtain compensation through two lawsuits. Therefore, this paper argues that in the future when the “Tort Law” is amended, it should be clear that the scope of property damage includes the damage of the defective product itself.