立法具有滞后性的特点,法律的不断修改是适应社会发展的必然要求,宪法也一样。然而宪法的经常性修改并不是弥合宪法规范与社会现实缝隙的最佳手段,宪法解释更符合宪法发展的趋势,更能维护宪法的稳定性与权威性。宪法解释的请求由哪些主体提起、宪法不同解释类型与提起宪法解释主体的关系等都是探讨的对象,本文结合《中华人民共和国宪法解释程序法(专家建议稿)》(以下简称《宪法解释程序法(建议稿)》)就相关问题做以简单分析。 The legislation has the characteristics of lagging behind. The constant revision of the law is an inevitable requirement for social development. The constitution is the same. However, the constant revision of the constitution is not the best means to bridge the gap between the constitutional norms and the reality of the society. The interpretation of the constitution is more in line with the trend of constitutional development and can better safeguard the stability and authority of the constitution. The constitutional interpretation of the request by which the main body filed, the different types of constitutional interpretation and the subject of the constitutional interpretation of the subject are all discussed, this article combines the “People’s Republic of China Constitutional Interpretation Procedure (Expert Proposal Draft)” (hereinafter referred to as “the Constitutional Interpretation Procedure Law (Proposal) ”) to do a simple analysis of the relevant issues.