论文部分内容阅读
新形势下,我国现行法制对检察机关的党外监督方式多样并行。其中审判机关对检察机关的监督因具有诉讼时空性、被动性而受到限制,因缺乏有效第三方制约主体而容易消解监督制约力,检察机关内部监督;舆论监督受到其自身无组织性、无序性、非理性的限制;人大监督由于制度构建的因素而不具有专门性、历时性;政协监督因其非权力性而削弱了其监督的效力。与之相比,党对检察机关的监督更具有优越性,可以弥补上述不足并有利于提高司法公信力。
Under the new situation, the current legal system in our country varies in a variety of ways over the supervision of the procuratorial organs. Among them, the supervision of procuratorial organs by the judicial organs is limited because of their temporal and spatial nature and passiveness of litigation. Due to the lack of effective third-party control subjects, the supervision of procuratorial organs is easily dismantled and the internal supervision of the procuratorial organs is easily dismissed. The public opinion supervision is subject to its own unorganizedness and disorder Sexual and irrational restrictions; the people’s congress supervision as a result of the system of construction factors do not have a special, diachronic; CPPCC supervision because of its non-power and undermine the effectiveness of its supervision. In contrast, the supervision of the procuratorial organs by the party is even more superior, which can make up for the above shortcomings and help to enhance the credibility of the judiciary.