论文部分内容阅读
在行将结束的这个世纪里,德国法院曾两次面对这样一个问题,即如何处理过去的法治崩塌所带来的司法困境:一次是在1945年纳粹政权垮台之后,另一次则是在1989年德意志民主共和国解体之后。在这两种情况下,法院都必须回答下述问题:某事违背了正义和法治的基本原则,但根据已经瓦解的法律体系中的实证法却是合法有效的,现在,我们是否仍应视之为合法有效?用简
In this century that is coming to an end, German courts have twice faced the question of how to deal with the judicial predicament caused by the collapse of the past rule of law: once the Nazi regime collapsed in 1945 and the other in 1989 After the dissolution of the German Democratic Republic. In both cases, the courts must answer the question: something that runs counter to the basic principles of justice and the rule of law, but is valid and valid in the light of the law of evidence in a disintegrated legal system and whether we should still treat it as Is it legal and valid?