论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较急性心肌梗死并室性心律失常患者应用胺碘酮、利多卡因两种药物治疗的效果。方法:从我院心血管内科病案管理系统中抽取2015年2月至2017年2月收治的急性心肌梗死并室性心律失常患者80例为研究对象,采用随机对照法将其分为对照组和实验组各40例,分别给予利多卡因、胺碘酮治疗,对两种药物治疗效果进行回顾性分析。结果:(1)实验组治疗总有效率90.0%显著高于对照组(P<0.05);(2)实验组副反应发生率7.5%显著低于对照组25.0%(P<0.05)。结论:相较于利多卡因,胺碘酮在急性心肌梗死并室性心律失常治疗中效果更佳,且副反应相对较少,值得借鉴。
Objective: To compare the effects of amiodarone and lidocaine in patients with acute myocardial infarction and ventricular arrhythmia. Methods: A total of 80 patients with acute myocardial infarction and ventricular arrhythmia admitted from February 2015 to February 2017 were selected from the cardiovascular medical records management system of our hospital. The patients were divided into control group and control group The experimental group of 40 cases, respectively, given lidocaine, amiodarone treatment, the two kinds of drug treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Results: (1) The total effective rate of the experimental group was 90.0%, significantly higher than that of the control group (P <0.05). (2) The incidence of side effects in the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group (25.0%, 7.5%, P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with lidocaine, amiodarone is more effective in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with ventricular arrhythmia, and the side effects are relatively less, it is worth learning from.