“花儿”作为中国少数民族音乐研究的课题,已经经历了半个多世纪的、广泛的、深入的、系统的研究,可谓是硕果累累。但从二十世纪后十年的研究来看,情况不容乐观。虽说“花儿”已被列为我国的非物质文化遗产名录,“花儿”在各自的属地也倍受各级政府重视及社会各界的关注,但总体上讲,对“花儿”研究的论文发表日渐稀少;而高质量、有学术价值的论文则更加匮乏;且由于经济因素的影响,传统的民间“花儿会”的性质也渐变为商品展销会;加之专业“花儿”歌手后继乏人;民间“花儿”歌手青黄不接;各地“花儿”研究会的活动已停止多年等等,这诸多的忧虑不能不让人深思。本文试图通过对“花儿”在二十世纪后十年的研究比对,从源流新探、民族新鉴、研究新谈三个方面入手,较为概括的总结出二十世纪后十年“花儿”研究的基本脉络,为后来者提供有价值的、可供参考的研究成果,以利于我们在本世纪继续对祖国优秀的非物质文化遗产——“花儿”进行更加深入、广泛、科学的研究。 As a research topic of Chinese minority music, “Flowers” has experienced more than half a century of extensive, in-depth and systematic research. However, judging from the study of the late twentieth century, the situation is not optimistic. Although “Flower ” has been listed as China’s intangible cultural heritage list, “flowers ” in their respective territories are also much attention of all levels of government and the attention of all sectors of society, but overall, the The publication of the research articles “Flowers” is increasingly scarce; the papers of high quality and academic value are even more scarce; and due to the influence of economic factors, the characteristics of the traditional folk “flower society” gradually change into commodity fairs; In addition, the professional “flower ” singer followed by the lack of people; folk “flowers ” singers yellow; around “flower ” research activities have stopped for many years, etc., many of these concerns can not but make people think. This article tries to summarize the last ten years of the twentieth century through the comparison of the research on the “Flower” in the second decade of the twentieth century from three aspects: new exploration of source, “Flower ” research, provide valuable and reference research results for the later, in order to help us continue to carry on the excellent intangible cultural heritage - “Flower ” in our motherland this century More in-depth, extensive and scientific research.