论文部分内容阅读
作文评分的通常做法是把作文分类,再分等;先搞试评,根据各类范文制定评分标准。这种做法由于缺乏科学的标准,主观随意性强,容易出现争议。这种争议由于观点不同而相持不下,因而同一篇文章的评分,往往差距极大.怎样的作文评分较能反映学生作文的实际水平呢?这学期我们对这个问题进行了探讨,决定采用了「分项计分法」。从四个班试行情况来看,效果还好。现将此种做法简介如下:
The usual way of scoring a composition is to classify the composition and then classify it; prioritize the evaluation and establish a scoring standard based on various types of models. This practice is arbitrarily subjective and prone to controversy due to lack of scientific standards. This type of controversy is controversial because of different opinions. Therefore, the score of the same article is often very different. What kind of composition score can reflect the actual level of student writing? This semester we discussed this issue and decided to adopt the Sub-item scoring method." From the perspective of the four trials, the results were good. This practice is described as follows: