论文部分内容阅读
医为仁术,每个医生都希望在临床中能取得较好的疗效。但影响疗效的因素甚多,它牵涉到医者、病者以及调剂、护理等各个方面,如一方不周,可使疗效不佳。但是,目前有一种偏见,那就是一种疑难重症治好了,就打听是用何法何方;特别是内科,人们一提起疗效好,就很自然地考虑到某个处方好,如果说疗效不好,那就是处方不好了。因此,病者盲目更医,医者盲目更方,致使医生看遍,处方用“尽”,病者心灰,医者束手。笔者认为,凡遇疗效不佳(限于当时的医疗条件者例外)时,应进行“十审”。
As a doctor, each doctor hopes to achieve better results in clinical practice. However, there are many factors that affect the curative effect. It involves doctors, patients, and adjustments, care and other aspects. If one side is unhappy, the curative effect can be poor. However, there is currently a kind of prejudice, that is, a serious problem is cured, and it is used to find out where; In particular, when people start to mention a curative effect, it is natural to consider that a certain prescription is good, if the curative effect is not Well, it’s a bad prescription. Therefore, the patients blindly seek medical treatment, and the doctors blindly and squarely, causing doctors to read over and use prescriptions to “do their best”. The patients are disheartened and the medical practitioners shiver. The author believes that whenever there is poor efficacy (except for medical conditions at the time), the “ten trials” should be conducted.