《北京档案》1992年第4期发表了罗力的《档案学术评论研究四问》一文,作者在文中指出,目前档案学术评论委实滞后于档案学术研究的发展速度与水平,但相信随着档案学术评论开展和其功能的逐步显示,在今后不久将会有长足的发展。原因在于任何学科理论研究在学科创建和恢复之初,人们更注意学科理论 “Beijing Archives,” No. 4, 1992, published a paper entitled “Four Questions on Academic Review of Archives,” in which the author pointed out that at present the archival academic commentary really lags behind the pace and level of development of archival academic research but believes that with the archives The gradual display of academic reviews and their functions will be well developed in the near future. The reason is that any disciplinary theory at the beginning of discipline creation and restoration, people pay more attention to discipline theory