大凡有些分量、有些“回声”的报道,特别是批评报道,都不可能是轻而易举得到的,必有记者的一番甜酸苦辣,这次采写“郎酒”报道,感受尤深。今年元月,当我从“中国质量万里行”组委会主任艾丰那里接受采写郎酒商标侵权案任务的时候,我就明确向他表示:关于假冒郎酒商标侵权案问题,我是一直在关注,手头掌握的情况也不少,可是问题也很复杂,这是个“马蜂窝”,所以过去迟迟不敢去碰。若能乘这次“中国质量万里行”东风,把问题捅开,广大消费者当然高兴,郎酒厂也会高兴。但是也要看到,这样必然会触及侵权者和搞假冒郎酒者的利益, In general, there are some components. Some “echo” reports, especially critical reports, can not easily be obtained. There must be some bittersweet reports from reporters. In January of this year, when I took over the task of trademark infringement upon trademark infringement from the organizer of “China Quality Miles”, I explicitly told him: I have been on the issue of counterfeit trademark infringement Concerned about the situation at hand grasp a lot, but the problem is very complicated, this is a “hornet’s nest,” so in the past not to touch the delay. If we can take this “China Miles” east wind, the problem poke, the vast number of consumers, of course, happy, Lang distillery will be happy. However, we must also see that this inevitably touches on the interests of infringers and fakers,