论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察分析中西医结合疗法治疗输卵管阻碍性不孕症84例临床疗效。方法:用于本次临床研究的84例输卵管阻碍性不孕症患者是2012年6月—2014年6月这一时期内由我院收治的,将其作为观察组,另将我院同期收治的84例输卵管阻碍性不孕症患者作为对照组,对观察组的患者采用中西医结合疗法治疗,对对照组的患者采用常规西医疗法治疗,治疗后观察两组患者的临床疗效、中医证候评分及不良反应情况,并进行比较。结果:观察组患者的总治疗有效率比之对照组患者明显较高,两组数据差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的中医证候评分比之对照组患者明显较低,两组数据差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的不良反应发生率比较差异不显著,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:采用中西医结合疗法治疗输卵管阻碍性不孕症疗效理想、安全性高,值得广大医务人员在临床上应用推广。
Objective: To observe and analyze the curative effect of 84 cases of tubal obstruction infertility treated by integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine. Methods: 84 cases of tubal obstruction infertility patients used in this clinical study were admitted to our hospital from June 2012 to June 2014, they were treated as observation group, and the same period in our hospital Of 84 patients with tubal obstruction infertility as a control group, the observation group of patients treated with Integrative Medicine, the control group of patients treated with conventional Western medicine, after treatment, the clinical efficacy of two groups of patients observed, TCM Syndrome Score and adverse reactions, and make a comparison. Results: The total effective rate of treatment in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). The score of TCM syndrome in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment of tubal obstruction infertility effective and safe, it is worth the majority of medical staff in the clinical application of promotion.