戚蓼生序本《石头记》上有大量异于甲戌本、己卯本、庚辰本的独有的回前回后评,目前学界对这些评语的作者是谁,这些评语是否属于脂评范围,还没有明确结论。本文通过比较脂评和戚序本回前回后评,发现二者在一个小的称呼方面存在明显差异,这可以为戚序本回前回后评的作者之争提供一个可以参考的旁证。 There are a great number of unique comments on this book, which were different from those of Xu Jia, Mao Mo Ben, and Geng Chen. Who are the authors of these reviews, and whether these reviews belong to fat criticism? Range, there is no clear conclusion. This article compares the fat evaluation and the Qi sequence back to back this review, and found that there is a clear difference between the two in a small address, which can provide a reference for the author of this series of preface back sequence reviews.