论文部分内容阅读
2003年9月,某运输公司的一辆大型货车在行驶过程中发生交通事故,致行人杨某当场死亡。2004年6月,经法院判决,由运输公司赔偿杨某家属28万余元,其中死亡补偿费按20年计算,为263600元。由于该贷车参加了某市人寿保险公司的第三者责任保险,运输公司赔偿后即向保险公司理赔。保险公司根据原《道路交通事故处理条例》(简称“条例”)进行理赔,其中死亡补偿费按10年计算,赔偿79560元。运输公司对此提出异议,认为法院已按《关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》(简称“解释”)的新标准判决赔偿,保险公司也应当按新标准理赔。双方争执不下,运输公司将此诉至法院。
In September 2003, a large truck of a shipping company was involved in an accident while traveling, leaving the marketer Yangmou dead on the spot. In June 2004, the court ruled that the transportation company should pay more than 280,000 yuan for Yang’s family members, of which the death compensation fee was 263,600 yuan in 20 years. As the car participated in a city life insurance company third party liability insurance, transportation company claims compensation to the insurance company. Insurance companies under the original “Road Traffic Accident Dispute Ordinance” (referred to as “Regulations ”) claims, of which the death compensation according to 10 years, compensation 79,560 yuan. The transport company objected to this and believed that the court has already awarded compensation according to the new standard of “Interpretation on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Compensation Cases for Personal Injury Compensation” (“” “Interpretation”), and the insurance company should make claims according to the new standard. Dispute between the two sides, the transport company will appeal to the court.