《文艺和意识形态》(载《文学评论》1991年第5期)原是我为第12届马列文论年会准备的论文,那次年会的中心议题就是文艺和意识形态问题。在准备论文的过程中,我翻阅了一些材料,发现对这个问题是存在分政的,有些观点在我看来并不一定符合马克思主义,对此,我在《文艺和意识形态》一文中表明了自己的看法。由于所涉及的观点大都来自我的熟人好友,我本着对事不对人的原则,没有在文章中提他们的名字,以表示对他们的尊重。文章也是有根有据,充分说理的,为的是开展讨论,明辩是非,追求真理。是不是这样,我想凡看过我的文章的读者,都会有目共睹自有公论的。可是,文章发表后虽不能说掀起一场轩然大波,至少也是“风乍起,吹绉一池春水”。仅就形诸文字的陆梅林先生的这篇《再谈观念形态文艺》(载《文艺争鸣》1992年1期)来说、可说是火气未消,说什么“先立靶子,然后再借题发挥”啦,“摘句取义”,“作逻辑的引中”啦,“无的放矢,打横炮” Literary and Ideological (No. 5, 1991, Literary Criticism) was originally a paper that I prepared for the 12th Annual Symposium on Marxism-Leninism. The central topic of that annual meeting was literary and ideological issues. During the preparation of the essay, I read through some materials and found that there is a division of government on this issue. Some of the views do not necessarily conform to Marxism in my opinion. To this, I have stated in the article “Literary and Ideological” My own opinion. Since most of the ideas I have come from my acquaintances and acquaintances, I did not mention their names in the article to show my respect for them based on the principle of wrongdoing. The article is also well-founded and fully justified in order to conduct discussions, clarify right and wrong, and pursue truth. This is not the case. I think all readers who have read my essay will see their own opinions. However, although the article can not be said after the publication of an uproar, at least, “the wind was blowing, blowing a pool of spring water.” Only for this text, Mr. Lu Meilin’s “talk about the concept of form and art” (contained in “Literary and Art Contest” 1992 1 period), can be described as anger, saying what “first target, and then lend a title to play ”“, ”Sentences from the Sentence,“ ”as a logical citation“ friends, ”targeted, horizontal gun"