论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨临床上急性脑梗死的表现与溶栓治疗的效果。方法选取被诊断为急性脑梗死的患者60例,随机分为观察组和对照组各30例,观察组采用溶栓治疗脑梗死,对照组用临床常用药物治疗。两组观察时间为3周,观察临床与溶栓的治疗效果,进行结果分析对比。结果用溶栓治疗的观察组显效18例,有效9例,总有效率为90.0%,对照组显效12例,有效5例,总有效率为56.7%。并且观察组患者对治疗的各个过程满意度较高。结论通过3周具体治疗,两组总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),溶栓治疗急性脑梗死有明显效果,并且在治疗和缓解临床症状上也有一定成效,值得我们在临床上研究和探讨。
Objective To investigate the clinical manifestations of acute cerebral infarction and thrombolytic therapy. Methods Sixty patients diagnosed as acute cerebral infarction were randomly divided into observation group (30 cases) and control group (30 cases). Cerebral infarction was treated by thrombolytic therapy in the observation group and common clinical medicine was used in the control group. The two groups were observed for 3 weeks, the clinical and thrombolytic effects were observed, the results were analyzed and compared. Results The observation group treated with thrombolysis was effective in 18 cases, effective in 9 cases, the total effective rate was 90.0% in the control group, 12 cases markedly effective in 5 cases, the total effective rate was 56.7%. Patients in the observation group were more satisfied with each course of treatment. Conclusions After three weeks of specific treatment, the total effective rate was significantly different between the two groups (P <0.05). The thrombolytic therapy of acute cerebral infarction has obvious effect and has certain effect in treating and relieving clinical symptoms, which is worth our clinical On the research and discussion.