论文部分内容阅读
《普通高中新课程标准》指出:“评价主体多元化”是当前评价改革的重要理念和方向,语文课程评价要尊重学生的主体地位,指导学生开展自我评价和促进反思。显然,传统作文教学的三无(无系统,无计划,无章法),作文教学的步骤(命题——习作——上交——批改——发还)与其精神背道而驰,必须进行改革。对于写作的评价,《普通高中新课程标准》还提到:应关注学生的写作态度和写作水平;论述类文本写作的评价,应考察能否恰当地表达自己的观点,并能用可靠的材料支撑观点。在这一理念下,如何上好与之相吻合的作文课,笔者就议论文支架的建构和实现方面做了些摸索。在此就先谈谈议论文支架的建构。
The “New Curriculum Standard for Senior High School” points out that “diversity of evaluation subject” is an important concept and direction of current evaluation reform. Language curriculum evaluation should respect students’ subjective position and guide students to carry out self-evaluation and promote reflection. Obviously, the three steps (no system, no plan, no rules) and the steps of writing teaching (Proposition - Exercises - Turn Over - Correction - Reimbursement) in traditional composition teaching run counter to their spirit and must be reformed. For the evaluation of writing, the “New Senior High School Curriculum Standards” also mentioned: should pay attention to students’ writing attitude and writing level; evaluation of class text writing evaluation should examine whether they can properly express their point of view, and can use reliable materials Support point of view. Under this concept, how to do a good composition with essay class, I made some exploration on the construction and implementation of argumentative support. Here to talk about the construction of the article support.